![]() |
| Job Charnock , founder of Calcutta? |
![]() |
| Job Charnock founding Calcutta en.wikipedia.org |
| Charnock's mausoleum,St.John's Church Kolkata,en.wikipedia.org |
Charnock coming from a Lancashire family, worked briefly for a merchant one Maurice Thomson (died 1676) between 1650 and 1653. He arrived in Bengal in 1655 to pursue a career with the English company. In January, 1658 he joined the East India Company's service in Bengal, where he was stationed at Cossimbazar, Hooghly, Bengal.
Because of his being honest, duty-bound and duty conscious, he drastically reduced the incidences of smuggling among his less scrupulous colleagues. Obviously for this reason, he was not popular among his colleagues and earned their ire.Further, he became a victim of stinking gossip and carping criticism to discredit him. Being resolute, he just gave a damn to such useless criticism and kept his critics at bay. Having worked in the company's trading division in saltpeter at Patna, now capital of Bihar, for four years, he got promotion to a higher post in 1664 and later became a senior manager in 1666. On his personal side, he chose a beautiful Hindu widow woman as his wife, despite criticism from his co workers. Soon he became the company's long serving dutiful officer and his hard work and integrity helped him become the head at Cossimbazar, second in charge of the Company's operations in Bengal.
In those days, Cossimbazar was a center of thriving smuggling operations when one William Hedges, became an agent of the Bay and Governor of Bengal. Hedges, was a poor administrator and the smuggling continued without any end in sight, undermining Charnock's authority. In 1685, upon Charnock becoming the Agent, as his predecessors were inefficient, he faced a serious crisis as a result of imposition of 3 1/2% customs duty on goods by the Nawob which was in violation of original 'firman.' The company refused to pay and the relationship between the Nawob and the English became strained. After several unsavory incidents, a truce had been reached and Charnock chose 'Sutanuti,' then "a low swampy village of scattered huts" but a place well chosen for the purpose of defense and at last settled down there in November, 1687. Here his wife and son unexpectedly died, leaving behind his three daughters.
Here there was further deterioration of relationship between the English and the ruling Nawab that led to the destruction of Sutaniti settlements. Charnock in those tough days somehow managed the ruler's enormous army through intelligence, diplomacy and smart war strategy. It was Charnock, who persuaded the English company at Madras to choose Sutaniti, the site of what is now Kolkata, as the headquarters of the company for the following reasons: 01. Quite safe from attacks from the enemies. 02. A clear firing line can be established when attacked by enemies. 03. Easy access to the sea by river. 04. Deep-water anchorage for the fleet to move in and out.
The Company in March, 1690, after long patient negotiations received permission from the Mogul ruler Aurangzeb in Delhi to re-establish a factory in Bengal, and on 24 August, 1690. The Mogul ruler and the local Agent of the Mogul ruler were losing enormous money, hence the ruler agreed to a compromise. Charnock came back to build the headquarters there and called it Calcutta. With the new Nawob giving full cooperation, on 10 February, 1691 an imperial grant was issued for the English to "contentedly continue their trade". In 1692, it became independent of Madras. In course of time Calcutta, the capital of British India, began to grow to become the largest city in the British empire next to London.
Charnock died in Calcutta on 10 January 1692 (or 1693). Over Charnock's simple grave in the graveyard of St. John's Church, Kolkata, a mausoleum was erected by Eyre, his son-in-law and successor, in 1695. The church being the second oldest Protestant church in Calcutta after John Zacharias Kiernander Old Mission Church (1770), The mausoleum is now regarded as a national monument.
Note: According to May 16,2003 ruling by the Calcutta High Court Job Charnock was not he founder of Calcutta. Before his arrival in 1690 natives in the three villages close to the river Hooghly had been active in trade,particularly the the areas were well known center of textile industries. Court pointed out: a living, evolving urban landscape cannot be attributed to a single calendar date or an individual's arrival.
Ref:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/1430454/Calcutta-was-not-founded-by-Briton-court-rules.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_Charnock
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Job-Charnock-not-Kolkatas-founder-Expert-committee/articleshow/36080070.cms
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/1430454/Calcutta-was-not-founded-by-Briton-court-rules.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_Charnock
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Job-Charnock-not-Kolkatas-founder-Expert-committee/articleshow/36080070.cms
K. N. Jayaraman (Author: navrangindia.blogspot.com )
(Reviewed May 15, 2026)

